DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO,WorldDrugTracker, helping millions, A 90 % paralysed man in action for you, I am suffering from transverse mylitis and bound to a wheel chair, With death on the horizon, nothing will not stop me except God................DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D ( ICT, Mumbai) , INDIA 25Yrs Exp. in the feld of Organic Chemistry,Working for GLENMARK GENERICS at Navi Mumbai, INDIA. Serving chemists around the world. Helping them with websites on Chemistry.Million hits on google, world acclamation from industry, academia, drug authorities for websites, blogs and educational contribution
Showing posts with label SITAGLIPTIN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SITAGLIPTIN. Show all posts

Monday, 2 March 2015

SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE MONOHYDRATE



P.S. : The views expressed are my personal and in no-way suggest the views of the professional body or the company that I represent.


 



Synthetic Communications: An International Journal for Rapid Communication of Synthetic Organic Chemistry

A practical and economical approach to synthesize sitagliptin

Volume 43, Issue 24, 2013

DOI:
10.1080/00397911.2013.773353
Kuaile Lina, Zhengyan Caia & Weicheng Zhoua*
pages 3281-3286
1Kuaile Lin, Zhengyan Cai, Weicheng Zhou*
State Key Lab of New Drug & Pharmaceutical Process, Shanghai Key Lab of
Anti-Infectives, Shanghai Institute of Pharmaceutical Industry, State Institute ofPharmaceutical Industry, Shanghai 200437, China
* Corresponding author: Weicheng Zhou, profzhouwc@yahoo.com.cn, Tel./fax: +8621 35052484
Economic syntheses of sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate, acknowledged as the first dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, have been achieved in an overall yield of 42.4% in four steps from 1-{3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6-dihydro-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazin-7(8H)-yl}-4-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)butane-1,3-dione. The key stereoselective reduction of this process was carried out by NaBH4/HCOOH instead of expensive and toxic catalysts or ligands.  

LOOK FOR SUPPLEMENTARY INFO IN ABOVE PAPER
   



  tga
.  


...............................  
NMR SEE AN ONLINE NMR BELOW  
NMR............http://file.selleckchem.com/downloads/nmr/S400205-Sitagliptin-phosphate-monohydrate-HNMR-Selleck.pdf
  ......................  




PAPER Graphical abstract: Quantitative analysis of sitagliptin using the 19F-NMR method: a universal technique for fluorinated compound detection  

http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2014/an/c4an01681e#!divAbstract

Quantitative analysis of sitagliptin using the 19F-NMR method: a universal technique for fluorinated compound detection

*
Corresponding authors
a
State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China E-mail: ayanju@163.com
b
Shanghai Institute for Food and Drug Control, Shanghai 201203, China
c
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Canada
d
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China E-mail: cpunmrswb@163.com
Analyst, 2015,140, 280-286
DOI: 10.1039/C4AN01681E


Vishva Shah, Royal Military College of Canada

 

 

CHECK OUT PREDICTIONS UNDERSTAND THE SIGNALS PREDICTIONS 1H NMR Sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate NMR spectra analysis, Chemical CAS NO. 654671-77-9 NMR spectral analysis, Sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate H-NMR spectrum PREDICTIONS 13 C NMR LOOK FOR DELTA VALUES OF GROUPS Sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate NMR spectra analysis, Chemical CAS NO. 654671-77-9 NMR spectral analysis, Sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate C-NMR spectrum


COSY NMR PREDICTION




BELOW PAPENT DESCIBES THIS DRUG WELL IS RANDOMLY CHOSEN


  http://www.google.com/patents/EP2491040A2?cl=en
The present invention relates to a novel method of preparing sitagliptin, and intermediates used therein. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Sitagliptin phosphate is a selective inhibitor of the second generation dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) and used to maintain the systemic concentration of incretin hormone at an optimum level. Sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate was approved in October 2006 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an adjuvant in dietetics or kinesiatrics for treatment of patients with type-2 diabetes and it is marketed in the United States and Korea under the trade name of JANUVIA™ (as a single agent).
Various methods for preparing sitagliptin and sitagliptin phosphate have been developed. For example, International Patent Publication WO 2003/004498 discloses a method of introducing a chiral-amine group using a chiral pyrazine derivative and to prepare sitagliptin by Arndt-Eistert Homologation using t-butoxylcarbonylamino-4-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)-butyric acid as a sitagliptin intermediate, as shown in Reaction Scheme 1.
Reaction Scheme 1
Figure imgf000003_0001
Wherein,
Boc is tert-butoxycarbonyl, TEA is trimethylamine, HOBt is 1- hydroxybenzotriazole, EDC is N-ethyl-N'-(3- dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide, and DIPEA is N,N-diisopropylethylamine.
International Patent Publication WO 2004/087650 discloses a method for preparing sitagliptin phosphate comprising the steps of: subjecting (2,4,5- trifluorophenyl)acetic acid to two-step reactions to obtain methyl 4-(2,4,5- trifluorophenyl)-3-oxophenylbutylate; conducting a stereoselective reduction of the resulting compound in the presence of (S)-BrNAP-RuCl2-Et3N under a high hydrogen pressure; hydrolyzing the reduced product to obtain (3S)-3-hydroxy- 4-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)-butyric acid, a key sitagliptin intermediate; and subjecting (3S)-3-hydroxy-4-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)-butyric acid to seven-step processes to obtain sitagliptin phosphate, as shown in Reaction Scheme 2.
Reaction Scheme 2
Figure imgf000004_0001
Wherein,
BINAP is 2,2'-bis(diphenylphosphino)-l,l'-binaphthyl, EDC is N-ethyl-N'-(3- dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide, Bn is benzyl, DIAD is diisopropyl azodicarboxylate, NMM is N-methylmorpholine, and ACN is acetonitrile.
Further, International Patent Publication WO 2004/085661 discloses a method for preparing sitagliptin by stereoselectively reducing an enamine using a platinum catalyst, PtO2, as shown in Reaction Scheme 3. Reaction Scheme 3
Figure imgf000005_0001
Further, WO 2005/097733 discloses a method for preparing sitagliptin by stereoselectively reducing an enamine employing a rhodium-based catalyst, [Rh(cod)Cl]2 having a chiral diphosphine ligand, as shown in Reaction Scheme 4.
Figure imgf000005_0002
The document [J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2009, 131, p.l 1316-11317] discloses a method for preparing sitagliptin by stereoselectively reducing an enamine using a ruthenium-based catalyst, Ru(OAc)2 having a chiral diphosphine ligand, and International Patent Publication WO 2009/064476 discloses a method for preparing sitagliptin by stereoselectively reducing an enamine using Ru(OAc)2and a chiral diphosphine ligand, or using a chiral acid together with a borohydride reducing agent (e.g., NaBH4).
Reaction Scheme 5
Figure imgf000009_0001
Example 1: Preparation of (2S)-2-(2,4,5-trifluorobenzyl)- oxirane
Figure imgf000013_0001
Step 1 : Preparation of (2S)-3-(2A5-trifluorophenyl)-l-chloro-2-propanol
Magnesium (Mg) (1.26 g) was suspended in tetrahydrofuran (THF) (10 ml), and a drop of 1,2-dibromoethane was added thereto. To the resulting mixture, 2,4,5-trifluorobenzene bromide (0.55 g) was added dropwise slowly and then stirred for 30 min. 2,4,5-trifluorobenzene bromide (9.0 g) dissolved in THF (50 ml) was added slowly dropwise to the resulting mixture for 30 min and then stirred at room temperature for 1 hour. Cul (0.72 g) was added to the resulting mixture and the reaction temperature was cooled to 0°C . (S)- epichlorohydrin (4.1 ml) dissolved in THF (40 ml) was added dropwise to the resulting mixture slowly over 30 min, heated to room temperature, and stirred for 2 hours. Satuated NH4CI (50 ml) and ethyl acetate (50 ml) were added to the resulting mixture, and the organic layer formed thereafter was separated. The separated organic layer was washed with 50 ml of satuated saline, dried over MgSO4, and filtered. The organic solvent was removed from the filtrate under a reduced pressure to obtain the title compound.
Step 2: Preparation of (2S)-2-(2,4,5-trifluorobenzyl)-oxirane
(2S)-3-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)-l-chloro-2-propanol obtained in step 1 was dissolved in methanol (50 ml), and NaOH (2.3 g) was added dropwise thereto. The resulting mixture was stirred for 1 hour and methanol was removed therefrom under a reduced pressure. Water (50 ml) and ethyl acetate (50 ml) were added to the resulting mixture, and the organic layer formed thereafter was separated. The separated organic layer was washed with satuated saline, dried over MgSO4, and filtered to remove MgSO4. The organic solvent was removed from the filtrate under a reduced pressure to obtain the title compound (6.8 g; yield: 80%).
1H-NMR(300MHz, CDC13): 6 7.17-7.05 (2H, m), 6.96-6.88 (2H, m), 3.16-3.13 (1H, m) 3.14 (1H, dd, J=4.68, 14.7), 2.82-2.77 (2H, m), 2.54-2.47 (1H, m). Preparation Example 2: Preparation of (2S)-2-(2,4,5-trifIuorobenzyl)- oxirane
Figure imgf000014_0001
Step 1 : Preparation of (2S)-3-(2A5-trifluorophenyl)-l-chloro-2-propanol
2N -PrMgCl (26 ml) suspended in THF was added dripwise to the 2,4,5-trifluorobenzene bromide (9.55 g) dissolved in THF (30 ml) at -15 °C for 60 min. Cul (0.72 g) was added thereto at -15 °C , and heated to -10 °C . (S)- epichlorohydrin (4.1 ml) dissolved in THF (40 ml) was added slowly to the resulting mixture, and stirred at 0 °C for 1 hour. Satuated NH4C1 (50 ml) and ethyl acetate (50 ml) were added to the resulting mixture, and the organic layer formed thereafter was separated. The separated organic layer was washed with 50 ml of satuated saline, dried over MgSO4, and filtered to remove MgSO4. The organic solvent was removed from the filtrate under a reduced pressure to obtain the title compound.
Step 2: Preparation of (2S)-2-(2,4,5-trifluorobenzyl)-oxirane (2S)-3-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)-l-chloro-2-propanol obtained in step 1 was dissolved in 50 ml of methanol, and NaOH (2.3 g) was added dropwise thereto. A mixture was stirred for 1 hour, and methanol was removed therefrom under a reduced pressure. Water (50 ml) and ethyl acetate (50 ml) were added thereto, and the organic layer formed thereafter was separated. The separated organic layer was washed with satuated saline, dried over MgSO4, and filtered to remove MgSO4. The organic solvent was removed from the filtrate under a reduced pressure to obtain the title compound (7.6 g; yield: 85%). Example 1: Preparation of Sitagliptin
Step 1: Preparation of (2R)-l-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl -4-pentene-2-ol
Figure imgf000015_0001
CuBr(CH3)2 (3.3 g) was added to a reactor under the nitrogen atmosphere and cooled to -78 °C . Vinylmagnesium bromide (240 ml) was added slowly to the reactor and stirred for 20 min. (2S)-2-(2,4,5- trifluorobenzyl)-oxirane (30 g) dissolved in THF (90 ml) was added dropwise slowly over 30 min, stirred at -78 °C for 30 min, and heated to 0 °C . 2N aqueous HC1 (300 ml) was added slowly to the resulting mixture, and the organic layer formed thereafter was separated. The separated organic layer was washed twice with satuated saline, dried over MgSO4, and filtered. The organic solvent was removed from the filtrate under a reduced pressure to obtain the title compound (34.5 g; yield: 100%).
1H-NMR(300MHz, CDC13): δ 7.15-7.06 (1H, m), 6.94-6.86 (1H, m), 5.85-5.79 (1H, m), 5.20-5.14 (2H, m), 3.90-3.85 (1H, m), 3.82 (1H, dd, J=4.6, 18.5), 2.69 (1H, dd, J=7.9, 14.0), 2.37-2.32 (1H, m), 2.24-2.17 (1H, m), 1.86(1H, Br). Step 2: Preparation of (2S)-l-(2-azido-4-pentenyl)-2A5-trifluorobenezene
Figure imgf000016_0001
Dichloromethane (300 ml) was added to the (2R)-1 -(2,4,5- trifluorophenyl)-4-pentene-2-ol obtained in step 1, and cooled to 0°C . Triethylamine (20.4 ml) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (1.57 g) were added successively to the mixture, and methansulfonyl chloride (1 1.2 ml) was added dropwise thereto for 30 min. The resulting mixture was stirred for 1 hour, water (150 ml) was added, and the organic layer formed thereafter was separated. The separated organic layer was washed twice with satuated saline, dried over MgSO4, and filtered. The organic solvent was removed from the filtrate under a reduced pressure. The residue thus obtained was dissolved in DMF (300 ml), and NaN3 (9.91 g) was added thereto. The resulting mixture was heated to 70 °C , stirred for 2 hours, and cooled to room temperature. And then water (150 ml) and ethyl acetate (150 ml) were added to the resulting mixture, and the organic layer formed thereafter was separated. The organic layer was washed twice with 150 ml of satuated saline, dried over MgSO4, and filtered. The organic solvent was removed from the filtrate under a reduced pressure to obtain the title compound (31.5 g; yield: 94%).
1H-NMR(300MHz, CDC13): δ 7.11-7.02 (1H, m), 7.97-6.87 (1H, m), 5.89-5.80 (1H, m), 5.23-5.17 (1H, m), 3.63-3.59 (1H, m), 2.87 (1H, dd, J=4.7, 18.7), 2.68 (1H, dd, J=7.9, 13.7), 2.38-2.17 (2H, m). Step 3: Preparation of (3R)-3-azido-4-(2A5-trifluorophenyl)-butyric acid
Figure imgf000017_0001
Acetonitril (300 ml) and water (300 ml) were added to the (2S)-l-(2- azido-4-pentenyl)-2,4,5-trifluorobenezene obtained in step 2, and cooled to 0°C . RuCl3 (0.5 g) and NaIO4 (93 g) were added to the mixture successively, and stirred for 5 hours. Ethyl acetate (90 ml) was added to the resulting mixture, filtered and the organic layer formed thereafter was separated. The separated organic layer was washed with IN HC1 (300 ml), satuated aqueous Na2S2O3 (300 ml) and satuated saline (300 ml), successively, dried over MgSO4, and filtered. The organic solvent was removed from the filtrate under a reduced pressure to obtain the title compound (32.2 g; yield: 100%). 1H-NMR(300MHz, CDC13): 5 10.5 (1H, br), 7.17-7.05 (1H, m), 7.02-
6.87 (1H, m), 4.14-4.03 (1H, m), 2.94-2.78 (2H, m), 2.65-2.51 (2H, m).
Step 4: Preparation of (3R)-3-azido-l-(3-trifluoromethyl-5,6-dihydro-8H- [ 1 ,2,41triazolor4,3-alpyrazin-7-yl)-4-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)-butan- 1 -one
Figure imgf000017_0002
(3R)-3-azido-4-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)-buryric acid (5 g) obtained in step 3 and triazole derivative of formula (VI) (5.3 g) were added to DMF (40 ml) and water (20 ml), stirred for 15 min, and cooled to 10°C . N- methylmorpholine (2.4 ml) was added to the mixture, stirred for 10 min, and cooled to 0 °C . EDC (5.6 g) was added to the resulting mixture, and stirred for 1 hour. Ethyl acetate (50 ml) and water (25 ml) were added to the resulting mixture, and the organic layer formed thereafter was separated. The separated organic layer was washed four times with 50 ml of satuated saline, dried over MgSO4, and filtered. The organic solvent was removed from the filtrate under a reduced pressure to obtain the title compound (7.8 g; yield: 93%).
1H-NMR(300MHz, CDC13): δ 7.20-7.11 (1H, m), 6.99-6.90 (1H, m), 5.20-4.96 (2H, m), 4.28-4.05 (5H, m), 2.98-2.67 (4H, m).
Step 5: Preparation of sitagliptin
Figure imgf000018_0001
(3R)-3-azido- 1 -(3-trifluoromethyl-5,6-dihydro-8H-[ 1 ,2,4]triazolo[4,3- a]pyrazin-7-yl)-4-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)-butan-l-one (6.4 g) obtained in step 4 and triphenylphosphin (4.3 g) were dissolved in THF (74 ml), heated to 50 °C , and stirred for 2 hours. An aqueous NH4OH (37 ml) was added to the resulting mixture and stirred for 10 hours. THF was removed from the resulting mixture under a reduced pressure, HCl (30 ml) and ethyl acetate (60 ml) were added threreto, and stirred. The water layer separated from the mixture was washed twice with 30 ml of n-hexane, satuated sodium bicarbonate was added to the water layer, and extracted three times with 60 ml of ethyl acetate. The resulting extracts were dried over MgSO4, and filtered. The organic solvent was removed from the filtrate under a reduced pressure to obtain the title compound (5.2 g; yield: 86%).
1H-NMR(300MHz, CDC13): δ 7.14-7.06 (1H, m), 7.00-6.88 (1H, m), 5.13-4.88 (2H, m), 4.24-3.80 (4H, m), 3.58 (1H, m), 2.85-2.66 (2H, m), 2.61-2.46 (2H, m), 2.11 (3H, br).
ABOVE IS ONLY ONE EXAMPLE LEADING TO SITAGLIPTIN

DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO .....FOR BLOG HOME CLICK HERE  
Join me on Linkedin

View Anthony Melvin Crasto Ph.D's profile on LinkedIn

Join me on Facebook FACEBOOK
Join me on twitterFollow amcrasto on Twitter
Join me on google plus Googleplus

amcrasto@gmail.com


.
 P.S. : The views expressed are my personal and in no-way suggest the views of the professional body or the company that I represent.








SITAGLIPTIN.................




GREENING UP DRUGS Merck process chemists redesigned and significantly shortened the original synthesis of type 2 diabetes drug candidate sitagliptin (Januvia) to include an unprecedented efficient hydrogenation of an unprotected enamine.
MERCK was selected for the award in the greener synthetic pathways category for revising the synthesis for sitagliptin, a chiral β-amino acid derivative that is the active ingredient in Januvia, the company's pending new treatment for type 2 diabetes. The breakthrough leading to the new synthesis was the discovery that the amino group of the key enamine intermediate doesn't need to be protected prior to enantioselective catalytic hydrogenation of the double bond.
This development has solved a long-standing problem in the synthesis of β-amino acid derivatives, which are known for their pharmacological properties and are commonly used as chiral building blocks, noted Karl B. Hansen, a Merck process chemist involved with the synthetic effort. The outcome has been to slash the number of reaction steps in the sitagliptin synthesis from eight to three, leading to an equally dramatic reduction in the amount of chemicals and solvent needed and the amount of waste generated.
Merck's first-generation synthesis of sitagliptin involved preparing a β-hydroxy carboxylic acid, which was converted to a protected β-lactam and then coupled to a triazole building block. Deprotecting the resulting intermediate provided the β-amino acid moiety, and sitagliptin was isolated as a phosphoric acid salt.
This synthesis involved a roundabout route involving four steps to introduce the pivotal chiral amino group of sitagliptin. The synthesis worked well to prepare more than 100 kg of the compound for clinical trials, and with modifications it was deemed to be a viable though not very green manufacturing process, Hansen pointed out. For example, the original synthesis required a number of distillations and aqueous extractions to isolate intermediates, leading to a large volume of waste to treat.
"Being environmentally friendly and economically savvy can, and does, go hand-in-hand."
Merck process chemists recognized that a much more efficient process was possible by synthesizing the β-amino acid portion of the molecule directly from an enamine. But the protection-deprotection of the amine nitrogen with an acyl group during the hydrogenation is difficult on a large scale, and unprotected reactions generally result in lower yields and lower enantiomeric excesses, Hansen said.
Undaunted, the Merck scientists working on the revised synthesis discovered that the amino group could be efficiently introduced by an unprotected hydrogenation using a rhodium catalyst with a ferrocenyl phosphine ligand named Josiphos (C&EN, Sept. 5, 2005, page 40). Merck turned to Solvias, a Swiss company with experience in asymmetric hydrogenations that manufactures Josiphos, as a partner to help speed up the process development.
The new synthesis involves first coupling trifluorophenyl acetic acid and triazole building blocks to form a diketoamide, which in turn is converted to the enamine. This sequence is carried out without isolating intermediates. The enamine is then hydrogenated, sitagliptin is isolated and recrystallized as the phosphoric acid salt, and the rhodium Josiphos catalyst is recovered.
In sum, the revised synthesis increases the overall yield of sitagliptin by nearly 50% and reduces the amount of waste by more than 80%. A key difference is that the original synthesis produced more than 60 L of aqueous waste per kg of product, while the new synthesis completely eliminates aqueous waste. When tallied up, Merck expects these savings will prevent formation of 150,000 metric tons of solid and aqueous process waste over the lifetime of Januvia. Industry analysts speculate that regulatory approval of the drug will come by early next year and that it's destined to become a top-selling drug.
The novel enamine hydrogenation "is arguably the most efficient means to prepare β-amino acid derivatives," noted R. P. (Skip) Volante, Merck's vice president of process research. The company currently is using the procedure to make several other exploratory drug candidates, he added. Overall, the redesigned synthesis of sitagliptin "is a green chemistry solution to the preparation of a challenging synthetic target and is an excellent example of a scientific innovation resulting in benefits to the environment," Volante said.

First generation route to sitagliptin. BINAP = 2,2'-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1'-binaphthyl; EDC = N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N'-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride; DIAD = di-isopropyl azodicarboxylate; NMM = N-methylmorpholine........http://www.technology.matthey.com/article/55/2/135-139/

http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2011/cc/c1cc11592h#!divAbstract

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v485/n7397/fig_tab/nature11117_F4.html
PAPER



DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO .....FOR BLOG HOME CLICK HERE  
Join me on Linkedin

View Anthony Melvin Crasto Ph.D's profile on LinkedIn

Join me on Facebook FACEBOOK
Join me on twitterFollow amcrasto on Twitter
Join me on google plus Googleplus

 amcrasto@gmail.com