DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO,WorldDrugTracker, helping millions, A 90 % paralysed man in action for you, I am suffering from transverse mylitis and bound to a wheel chair, With death on the horizon, nothing will not stop me except God................DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D ( ICT, Mumbai) , INDIA 25Yrs Exp. in the feld of Organic Chemistry,Working for GLENMARK GENERICS at Navi Mumbai, INDIA. Serving chemists around the world. Helping them with websites on Chemistry.Million hits on google, world acclamation from industry, academia, drug authorities for websites, blogs and educational contribution

Friday 26 December 2014

Basics of Solid-State NMR






NMR stands for nuclear magnetic resonance and functions as a powerful tool for chemical characterization. Even though NMR is used mainly for liquids and solutions, technology has progressed to where NMR of solids can be obtained with ease. Aptly named as solid state NMR, the expansion of usable phases has invariably increased our ability to identify chemical compounds. The reason behind difficulties using the solid state lie in the fact that solids are never uniform. When put through a standard NMR, line broadening interactions cannot be removed by rapid molecular motions, which results in unwieldy wide lines which provide little to no useful information. The difference is so staggering that lines broaden by hundreds to thousands of hertz as opposed to less than 0.1 Hz in solution when using an I = 1/2 spin nucleus.
A process known as magic angle spinning (MAS), where the sample is tilted at a specific angle, is used in order to overcome line broadening interactions and achieve usable peak resolutions. In order to understand solid state NMR, its history, operating chemical and mathematical principles, and distinctions from gas phase/solution NMR will be explained.

History

The first notable contribution to what we know today as NMR was Wolfgang Pauli’s (Figure) prediction of nuclear spin in 1926. In 1932 Otto Stern (Figure) used molecular beams and detected nuclear magnetic moments.
Austrian theoretical physicist Wolfgang Ernst Pauli (1900-1958).
German physicist Otto Stern (1888 - 1969).
Four years later, Gorter performed the first NMR experiment with lithium fluoride (LiF) and hydrated potassium alum (K[Al(SO4)2]•12H2O) at low temperatures. Unfortunately, he was unable to characterize the molecules and the first successful NMR for a solution of water was taken in 1945 by Felix Bloch (Figure). In the same year, Edward Mills Purcell ([link]) managed the first successful NMR for the solid paraffin. Continuing their research, Bloch obtained the 1H NMR of ethanol and Purcell obtained that of paraffin in 1949. In the same year, the chemical significance of chemical shifts was discovered. Finally, high resolution solid state NMR was made possible in 1958 by the discovery of magic angle spinning.
Swiss physicist Felix Bloch (1905-1983).
American physicist Edward Mills Purcell (1912-1997).

How it works: from machine to graph

NMR spectroscopy works by measuring the nuclear shielding, which can also be seen as the electron density, of a particular element. Nuclear shielding is affected by the chemical environment, as different neighboring atoms will have different effects on nuclear shielding, as electronegative atoms will tend to decrease shielding and vice versa. NMR requires the elements analyzed to have a spin state greater than zero. Commonly used elements are 1H, 13C, and 29Si. Once inside the NMR machine, the presence of a magnetic field splits the spin states ([link]).
Spin state splitting as a function of applied magnetic field.
From ([link]) we see that a spin state of 1/2 is split into two spin states. As spin state value increases, so does the number of spin states. A spin of 1 will have three spin states, 3/2 will have four spin states, and so on. However, higher spin states increases the difficulty to accurately read NMR results due to confounding peaks and decreased resolution, so spin states of ½ are generally preferred. The E, or radiofrequency shown in ([link]) can be described by [link], where µ is the magnetic moment, a property intrinsic to each particular element. This constant can be derived from [link], where ϒ is the gyromagnetic ratio, another element dependent quantity, h is Planck’s constant, and I is the spin.
[link] can have E substituted for hν, leading to [link], which can solve for the NMR resonance frequency (v).
Using the frequency (v), the δ, or expected chemical shift may be computed using [link].
Delta (δ) is observed in ppm and gives the distance from a set reference. Delta is directly related to the chemical environment of the particular atom. For a low field, or high delta, an atom is in an environment which produces induces less shielding than in a high field, or low delta.

NMR instrument

An NMR can be divided into three main components: the workstation computer where one operates the NMR instrument, the NMR spectrometer console, and the NMR magnet. A standard sample is inserted through the bore tube and pneumatically lowered into the magnet and NMR probe ([link]).
Standard NMR instrument, with main components labeled: (A) bore tube, (B) outer magnet shell, (C) NMR probe.
The first layer inside the NMR ([link]) is the liquid nitrogen jacket. Normally, this space is filled with liquid nitrogen at 77 K. The liquid nitrogen reservoir space is mostly above the magnet so that it can act as a less expensive refrigerant to block infrared radiation from reaching the liquid helium jacket.
Diagram of the main layers inside an NMR machine.
The layer following the liquid nitrogen jacket is a 20 K radiation shield made of aluminum wrapped with alternating layers of aluminum foil and open weave gauze. Its purpose is to block infrared radiation which the 77 K liquid nitrogen vessel was unable to eliminate, which increases the ability for liquid helium to remain in the liquid phase due to its very low boiling point. The liquid helium vessel itself, the next layer, is made of stainless steel wrapped in a single layer of aluminum foil, acting once again as an infrared radiation shield. It is about 1.6 mm thick and kept at 4.2 K.
Inside the vessel and around the magnet is the aluminum baffle, which acts as another degree of infrared radiation protection as well as a layer of protection for the superconducting magnet from liquid helium reservoir fluctuations, especially during liquid helium refills. The significance is that superconducting magnets at low fields are not fully submerged in liquid helium, but higher field superconducting magnets must maintain the superconducting solenoid fully immersed in liquid helium The vapor above the liquid itself is actually enough to maintain superconductivity of most magnets, but if it reaches a temperature above 10 K, the magnet quenches. During a quench, the solenoid exceeds its critical temperature for superconductivity and becomes resistive, generating heat. This heat, in turn, boils off the liquid helium. Therefore, a small opening at the very base of the baffle exists as a path for the liquid helium to reach the magnet surface so that during refills the magnet is protected from accidental quenching.

Problems with solid state NMR

The most notable difference between solid samples and solution/gas in terms of NMR spectroscopy is that molecules in solution rotate rapidly while those in a solid are fixed in a lattice. Different peak readings will be produced depending on how the molecules are oriented in the magnetic field because chemical shielding depends upon the orientation of a molecule, causing chemical shift anisotropy. Therefore, the effect of chemical shielding also depends upon the orientation of the molecule with respect to the spectrometer. These counteracting forces are balanced out in gases and solutions because of their randomized molecular movement, but become a serious issue with fixed molecules observed in solid samples. If the chemical shielding isn’t determined accurately, neither will the chemical shifts (δ).
Another issue with solid samples are dipolar interactions which can be very large in solid samples causing linewidths of tens to hundreds of kilohertz to be generated. Dipolar interactions are tensor quantities, which demonstrate values dependent on the orientation and placement of a molecule in reference to its surroundings. Once again the issue goes back to the lattice structure of solids, which are in a fixed location. Even though the molecules are fixed, this does not mean that nuclei are evenly spread apart. Closer nuclei display greater dipolar interactions and vice versa, creating the noise seen in spectra of NMR not adapted for solid samples. Dipolar interactions are averaged out in solution states because of randomized movement. Spin state repulsions are averaged out by molecular motion of solutions and gases. However, in solid state, these interactions are not averaged and become a third source of line broadening.

Magic angle spinning

In order to counteract chemical shift anisotropy and dipolar interactions, magic angle spinning was developed. As discussed above, describing dipolar splitting and chemical shift aniostoropy interactions respectively, it becomes evident that both depend on the geometric factor (3cos2θ-1).
If this factor is decreased to 0, then line broadening due to chemical shift anisotropy and dipolar interactions will disappear. Therefore, solid samples are rotated at an angle of 54.74˚, effectively allowing solid samples to behave similarly to solutions/gases in NMR spectroscopy. Standard spinning rates range from 12 kHz to an upper limit of 35 kHz, where higher spin rates are necessary to remove higher intermolecular interactions.

Application of solid state NMR

The development of solid state NMR is a technique necessary to understand and classify compounds that would not work well in solutions, such as powders and complex proteins, or study crystals too small for a different characterization method.
Solid state NMR gives information about local environment of silicon, aluminum, phosphorus, etc. in the structures, and is therefore an important tool in determining structure of molecular sieves. The main issue frequently encountered is that crystals large enough for X-Ray crystallography cannot be grown, so NMR is used since it determines the local environments of these elements. Additionally, by using 13C and 15N, solid state NMR helps study amyloid fibrils, filamentous insoluble protein aggregates related to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, type II diabetes, Huntington’s disease, and prion diseases.

Bibliography

  • J. W. Akitt, NMR and Chemistry, 3rd Edn., Chapman & Hall, London (1992).
  • A. R. Grimmer and B. Blümich, Introduction to Solid-State NMR, Springer-Verlag, Berlin(1994).
  • J. A. Iggo, NMR Spectroscopy in Inorganic Chemistry, Oxford University Press, New York (1999).
  • J. C. C. Chan, Top. Curr. Chem., 2011, 306, 47.
  • R. Freeman, Chem Heterocyc Compd, 1995, 31, 1004-1005.
  • Jeol USA, JEOL Delta-GSX 270 NMR Magnet Destruction, <http://www.jeolusa.com>
  • University of Pittsburgh, Magnet Safety, <http://www.ehs.pitt.edu/assets/docs/magnet-safety.pdf>, 2008, (accessed 15 February 2012).








DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO .....FOR BLOG HOME CLICK HERE

Join me on Linkedin

View Anthony Melvin Crasto Ph.D's profile on LinkedIn

Join me on Facebook FACEBOOK
Join me on twitterFollow amcrasto on Twitter     
Join me on google plus Googleplus

 amcrasto@gmail.com






Thursday 25 December 2014

Quercetin



Quercetin





Quercetin; CAS: 117-39-5
     L. Y. Foo, et al., Phytochemistry, 2000, 54, 539-548
      


















(500MHz, Methanol-d4) δ: 7.73(1H, s, H-2'), 7.63(1H, d, J=8.5, H-6'), 6.88(1H, d, J=8.0, H-5'), 6.39(1H, s, H-8), 6.18(1H, s, H-6)





13 c nmr







(125MHz, Methanol-d4) δ : 177.5(C-4), 165.8(C-7), 162.7(C-5), 158.4(C-9), 148.9(C-3'), 148.1(C-2), 146.4(C-4'), 137.4(C-3), 124.3(C-1'), 121.8(C-6'), 116.4(C-5'), 116.1(C-2'), 104.7(C-10), 99.4(C-6), 94.6(C-8)


mass


槲皮素





ir
槲皮素




DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO .....FOR BLOG HOME CLICK HERE


Join me on Linkedin

View Anthony Melvin Crasto Ph.D's profile on LinkedIn

Join me on Facebook FACEBOOK
Join me on twitterFollow amcrasto on Twitter     
Join me on google plus Googleplus

 amcrasto@gmail.com


meso-2,3-Dibromosuccinic acid

meso-2,3-Dibromosuccinic acid
meso-2,3-Dibromosuccinic acid



Synonyms(2R,3S)-2,3-Dibromobutanedioic acid
Name in Chemical AbstractsButanedioic acid, 2,3-dibromo-, (2R,3S)-
CAS No608-36-6

Molecular formulaC4H4Br2O4
Molecular mass275.88

13C NMR

13C-NMR: meso-2,3-Dibromosuccinic acid
125 MHz, DMSO-d6
delta [ppm]assignment
43.5CHBr
167.7COOH
39.6DMSO-d6






1H NMR

meso-2,3-Dibromosuccinic acid
delta [ppm]mult.atomsassignment
4.52s2 HCHBr
13.75broad s2 HCOOH
2.45s6 HDMSO













IR



IR: meso-2,3-Dibromosuccinic acid
[KBr, T%, cm-1]
[cm-1]assignment
3500-2200O-H valence, superimposed on C-H valence
1722C=O valence
655C-Br valence


raman










mass









Addition of bromine to fumaric acid to meso-dibromosuccinic acid


75


Operating scheme

Operating scheme






DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO .....FOR BLOG HOME CLICK HERE

Join me on Linkedin

View Anthony Melvin Crasto Ph.D's profile on LinkedIn

Join me on Facebook FACEBOOK
Join me on twitterFollow amcrasto on Twitter     
Join me on google plus Googleplus

 amcrasto@gmail.com